<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Bill Sammon</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/bill_sammon</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Bill Sammon</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Fox News&#x27; Sammon ignores contrary evidence in suggesting that Rep. Frank allowed personal relationship to affect his oversight of Fannie Mae</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810080023</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;The O&#x27;Reilly Factor&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and in a FoxNews.com article, Bill Sammon suggested that Rep. Barney Frank allowed his relationship in the 1990s with Herb Moses, a Fannie Mae official at the time, to improperly influence his conduct as a member of the House Financial Services Committee. However, in his article, Sammon cited only an anonymous Republican congressional staffer and a member of the conservative Media  Research Center. Sammon also misrepresented Frank&#x27;s record by reporting that Frank &#x22;spent years blocking GOP lawmakers from imposing tougher regulations&#x22; on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac without noting that during the period in question, Frank supported legislation to &#x3C;em&#x3E;increase&#x3C;/em&#x3E; regulation of Fannie Mae and create a government regulatory agency that would oversee some aspects of the company.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810080023</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Oct 2008 18:25:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News&#x27; Sammon dismissed &#x22;nature of&#x22; Corsi falsehoods as &#x22;relatively innocuous&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808180009</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hannity &#x26;amp; Colmes&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Bill Sammon said of falsehoods in Jerome Corsi&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Obama Nation&#x3C;/em&#x3E;: &#x22;Well, the nature of those inaccuracies, I think, is relatively innocuous. ... The first thing on that 40-page document that the Obama camp points out is that the author got their wedding date wrong -- the year of their wedding wrong. OK. Well, that&#x27;s not a good thing, but it doesn&#x27;t go to the ideology of Obama.&#x22; In fact, Corsi&#x27;s book also includes a number of falsehoods about Obama&#x27;s policy positions.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808180009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:50:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sammon and  Kondracke blamed state and local governments for Katrina response in  Louisiana</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710260001</link>
<description>During the &#x22;All-Star Panel&#x22; segment on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Special Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Examiner&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Bill Sammon and 
&#x3C;em&#x3E;Roll Call&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mort Kondracke blamed 
the Louisiana 
state and local governments for their handling of Hurricane Katrina while 
excusing or ignoring the failures of the federal government. Sammon concluded 
that &#x22;to the extent that anybody failed [during Katrina], I think it was state 
and local, and in this case [the California wildfires], the state and locals 
have stepped up.&#x22; However, two congressional reports -- while not excusing the state and local governments -- extensively detailed the federal government&#x27;s failures in its preparation for and response to Katrina.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710260001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:09:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bill Sammon  reported contrast in Obama, Bush positions on Pakistan, but not Bush  flip-flops</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708070010</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Special Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Examiner&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Bill Sammon 
asserted that, in contrast with Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s recent statement, 
President Bush said at a press 
conference, &#x22;[W]e&#x27;ll go after terrorists in Pakistan, but we&#x27;ll work with 
Musharraf to do that,&#x22; as Sammon put it. In fact, Bush refused to give a direct 
answer about whether he would pursue terrorists in Pakistan without 
Musharraf&#x27;s consent, and he has given conflicting statements on this issue in 
the past.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708070010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:30:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Will media ask if Specter had &#x22;conflict of interest&#x22; when he led Ruby Ridge investigation?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703210015</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703210015</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:51:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sammon: Like Nixon pardon, Iraq invasion may look better in future</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701030017</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701030017</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:54:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Reporting on terror arrests in Britain, numerous media outlets ask: Will the news help Bush?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608150008</link>
<description>In the wake of the recent thwarting of an alleged terrorist plot in Britain, numerous media outlets have posed the question of whether news of the event would benefit President Bush, often letting conservatives or Republican officials spin the news in favor of the administration. Many of the reports neglected to consider whether the news could actually hurt Bush politically.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608150008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:23:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Conservatives tout &#x22;combative&#x22; Snow&#x27;s barrage of false attacks on the media</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605150010</link>
<description>The White House released a series of statements, reportedly initiated by new press secretary Tony Snow, attacking specific media reports and editorials as misleading. Conservatives in the media have touted the statements as indicative of a new willingness on the part of the White House communications office, led by Snow, to call the press on its misinformation. But &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; has found that, of the six &#x22;Setting the Record Straight&#x22; releases issued from May 8 to May 11, at least four are highly misleading.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605150010</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 18:36:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Special Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E; distorted significance of leak case correction</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604140008</link>
<description>Fox News journalists and commentators repeatedly -- and baselessly -- cited a correction issued by CIA leak case special counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald as evidence that the Bush administration had not &#x22;hyp[ed]&#x22; prewar intelligence and that reporters had &#x22;wrongly accuse[d]&#x22; President Bush of directing I. Lewis &#x22;Scooter&#x22; Libby to provide false information to reporters about Iraq&#x27;s supposed nuclear program to justify the decision to invade Iraq.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604140008</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 16:03:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox pundits: Dems&#x27; culture of corruption campaign defunct with DeLay departure</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604050012</link>
<description>On Fox News, numerous media figures asserted that Rep. Tom DeLay&#x27;s (R-TX) decision to resign from Congress will hurt Democrats&#x27; ability to campaign against congressional Republicans&#x27; record of corruption -- and DeLay&#x27;s part in it -- during the November 2006 midterm elections. But such predictions overlook the widening ethics scandals involving DeLay and the Republican Party.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604050012</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Apr 2006 18:16:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Count the falsehoods: Sammon discussed 2000 election recount on C-SPAN&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603160002</link>
<description>On C-SPAN&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Examiner&#x3C;/em&#x3E; senior White House correspondent Bill Sammon claimed that the U.S. Supreme Court halted the Florida recount in the 2000 presidential election by a 7-2 margin; and that a study of the 2000 presidential vote in Florida, commissioned by a consortium of major media outlets, &#x22;concluded essentially that [George W.] Bush would have won even if the Supreme Court hadn&#x27;t stopped the counting.&#x22; Both of these statements are false</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603160002</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:27:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sammon misrepresented poll data to assign &#x22;the lion&#x27;s share of the blame&#x22; for Katrina response to &#x22;local and state officials&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603060012</link>
<description>Author and &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Examiner&#x3C;/em&#x3E; senior White House correspondent Bill Sammon, apparently citing a September 2005 Gallup poll, stated that only &#x22;[t]hirteen percent&#x22; of respondents &#x22;blamed the federal government&#x22; for the lackluster response to Hurricane Katrina and that &#x22;the lion&#x27;s share of the blame falls on the local and state officials.&#x22; In fact, 31 percent of those surveyed said either that &#x22;George W. Bush&#x22; or &#x22;federal agencies&#x22; were &#x22;most responsible for the problems in New Orleans after the hurricane,&#x22; compared with 25 percent who assigned the most blame to &#x22;state and local officials.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603060012</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Mar 2006 17:55:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sammon called Cheney incident aftermath a &#x22;tempest in a teapot&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200602130006</link>
<description>During Fox News&#x27; coverage of a February 13 White House press conference in which press secretary Scott McClellan was repeatedly asked about the administration&#x27;s initial failure to inform the public of the incident in which Vice President Dick Cheney accidentally shot one of his hunting partners, Fox News political analyst Bill Sammon called the issue &#x22;a little bit of a tempest in a teapot.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200602130006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:43:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>