<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Jim Angle</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/jim_angle</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Jim Angle</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Media downplay former CIA official Brennan&#x27;s support of &#x22;enhanced interrogation techniques&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200901070010</link>
<description>Reports have claimed that former CIA official John Brennan &#x22;withdrew from consideration&#x22; as President-elect Barack Obama&#x27;s choice for CIA director because of criticism from &#x22;liberal groups&#x22; that &#x22;his tenure coincided with controversial Bush administration programs&#x22; -- or, in the words of Fox News&#x27; Jim Angle, &#x22;the left ... torpedoed&#x22; Brennan &#x22;because he was part of the war on terror over the last decade.&#x22; But these outlets did not mention that Brennan was not simply at the CIA at the same time as the interrogation and rendition policies were instituted or carried out but, in fact, has publicly supported them.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200901070010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:10:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News repeatedly echoes only opponents of Employee Free Choice Act</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200811260003</link>
<description>Fox News hosts, reporters, and contributors have repeatedly provided or echoed the claims of only opponents of the Employee Free Choice Act, which would give workers the right to form or join a union if a majority of workers sign a card stating they want to unionize. Absent from numerous reports and discussions on Fox News is the argument made by proponents of EFCA that under the current system, employers often fire union supporters and pressure employees to vote against unionizing.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200811260003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:08:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media react to sec. of state rumors with suggestions of a rogue Clinton agenda, Clinton as Obama&#x27;s &#x22;enem[y]&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200811150003</link>
<description>Discussing reports that President-elect Barack Obama is considering naming Sen. Hillary Clinton secretary of state, several media figures have responded with smears, including speculation that Clinton would pursue her own agenda as secretary of state and not Obama&#x27;s, references to Clinton as Obama&#x27;s &#x22;enem[y],&#x22; and speculation that Obama is considering the nomination because if Clinton remains in the Senate, she poses a threat of challenging him for the Democratic nomination in 2012 and can &#x22;mak[e] trouble&#x22; for him in the Senate.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200811150003</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 20:20:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Angle uncritically reported Hatch&#x27;s remarks downplaying reach of government&#x27;s warrantless eavesdropping program </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807100011</link>
<description>On&#x3C;em&#x3E; Special Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Jim Angle reported that during debate on the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, &#x22;Senator Orrin Hatch dismissed the idea that the intelligence agencies were trying to listen to anyone other than those with terrorist connections&#x22; and aired a clip of Hatch stating, &#x22;I don&#x27;t want to bruise anyone&#x27;s ego, but if Al Qaeda is not on your speed dial, the government is probably not interested in you.&#x22; Angle did not note that several news articles have reported that surveillance under the government&#x27;s warrantless eavesdropping program was not limited to those with &#x22;Al Qaeda on [their] speed dial,&#x22; but also included thousands of Americans with no ties to any terrorist group.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807100011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:57:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Discussing  proposed immunity, Angle omitted judge&#x27;s finding that no &#x22;reasonable entity&#x22;  could think actions urged by Bush admin. were legal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712190004</link>
<description>In describing the Senate debate over granting retroactive legal immunity to 
telecommunications companies that allegedly cooperated with the government&#x27;s 
program of warrantless domestic eavesdropping, Fox News&#x27; Jim Angle stated that 
the debate &#x22;is over whether or not to give immunity to the telecom companies who 
were told by the administration that they were acting lawfully and asked their 
cooperation, and they gave it.&#x22; But Angle did not mention that, in a case 
challenging the legality of AT&#x26;amp;T&#x27;s alleged cooperation with the wiretapping 
program, a judge found that AT&#x26;amp;T &#x22;cannot seriously contend that a reasonable 
entity in its position could have believed&#x22; that it would be lawful for the 
company to cooperate with the government.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712190004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:08:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Angle falsely  claimed Dems&#x27; bill would be first to require a court order to intercept terrorism suspects&#x27; calls to  U.S.</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710120010</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Special Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Jim Angle 
falsely claimed that proposed revisions to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance 
Act (FISA) would, for 
the first time, require 
the federal government to obtain a court order to intercept the communications 
of terrorism suspects 
abroad when they call the United States. Angle asserted that 
&#x22;even requiring warrants for terrorists calling the U.S. from abroad 
is a major departure, something the law has never required since it was passed 
some 30 years ago.&#x22; In 
fact, with few exceptions, FISA, as originally enacted in 1978, required the government to obtain a court order to 
conduct &#x22;electronic 
surveillance,&#x22; which FISA defines in part as 
&#x22;the acquisition by an electronic, mechanical, or other surveillance device of 
the contents of any wire communication to or from a person in the United States, 
without the consent of any party thereto, if such acquisition occurs in the 
United States.&#x22; It was only in 
August that Congress categorically excluded from the warrant 
requirement any 
&#x22;surveillance directed at a person reasonably believed to be located outside of 
the United 
States.&#x22; That exclusion is due to expire in 
February 2008.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710120010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:59:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Angle repeatedly  misrepresented Limbaugh&#x27;s and &#x22;critics&#x27;&#x22; comments</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710030002</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Jim Angle 
repeatedly misrepresented both Rush 
Limbaugh&#x27;s &#x22;phony 
soldiers&#x22; comment and the arguments of &#x22;Limbaugh&#x27;s critics,&#x22; 
falsely reinforcing Limbaugh&#x27;s claim that he was referring to actual military 
imposters, rather than service members or former service members with whom he 
disagrees.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710030002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:24:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox  News&#x27; Angle, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash.&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E; Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial misrepresented  upcoming  Iraq  report as &#x22;Petraeus&#x27; report&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708170004</link>
<description>Fox News&#x27; Jim Angle asserted that the upcoming report to Congress on the 
Iraq war will be &#x22;General David 
Petraeus&#x27; report.&#x22; In fact, the bill mandating the report requires 
that President Bush submit the report to Congress and that Petraeus 
&#x22;be 
made available to testify in open and closed sessions before the relevant 
committees of the Congress.&#x22; Similarly, a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial contradicted its 
own paper&#x27;s reporting in 
asserting that Petraeus is &#x22;expected to elaborate&#x22; on 
his claims 
of progress in 
Iraq &#x22;in a report to Congress in 
September.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708170004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:20:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s Angle misrepresented NASA correction to claim 1934 is now &#x22;hottest year&#x22; on record</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708120001</link>
<description>On 
&#x3C;em&#x3E;Special Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Jim Angle 
reported that NASA was forced &#x22;to admit it was wrong when it said that 1998 was 
the hottest year on record&#x22; and that NASA &#x22;now says 1934 was the hottest year, 
followed by 1998, then 1921.&#x22; But Angle did 
not 
inform 
viewers that 
NASA&#x27;s revision affected annual temperature rankings for the United States 
only; it had no effect on the annual global temperature rankings.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708120001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:49:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Angle omitted question Mueller was asked, then asserted it was &#x22;unclear&#x22; whether he had contradicted Gonzales</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708020002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708020002</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:20:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Angle&#x27;s report on  Gonzales hearing falsely identified Specter as a  Democrat</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707250001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707250001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:49:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News&#x27; Angle mischaracterized &#x3C;em&#x3E;Sun-Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; report, Obama land deal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704250011</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704250011</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:09:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s Angle falsely suggested Kaine condemned Moran&#x27;s comments on gun control</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704200001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704200001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:00:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media failed to report Pelosi&#x27;s clarification of her message to Syria</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704060015</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704060015</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Apr 2007 19:10:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite evidence to the contrary, Angle claimed Pelosi didn&#x27;t press Syria on &#x22;serious issues&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704060012</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704060012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Apr 2007 17:30:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>