<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - John Roberts</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/john_roberts</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: John Roberts</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Buchanan overstates Democratic support for Alito and Roberts on Supreme Court confirmation votes</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810200014</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Pat Buchanan misrepresented Senate votes by Democrats on the confirmations of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justice Samuel Alito, saying, &#x22;Roberts probably got 25 Democrats, Alito probably got a dozen.&#x22; In fact, four Democrats voted to confirm Alito, while Roberts received 22 votes from Democrats.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810200014</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:55:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Why did CNN&#x27;s Roberts interview Roger Stone, &#x22;professional dirty trickster&#x22; and founder of C.U.N.T.?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810130014</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s John Roberts interviewed &#x22;Republican political consultant&#x22; Roger Stone, who advanced the oft-repeated conservative smear that Sen. Barack Obama would be &#x22;dangerous&#x22; as president. Although Roberts said Stone is &#x22;famous for running some very, very effective negative campaigns over the course of American political history,&#x22; he didn&#x27;t mention Stone&#x27;s recent efforts, such as the anti-Hillary Clinton 527 group Citizens United Not Timid, which emphasized its acronym on its website and on T-shirts.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810130014</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:09:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Roberts failed to challenge Romney on taxes falsehood</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200809180024</link>
<description>On CNN&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;American Morning&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, John Roberts did not challenge Mitt Romney&#x27;s suggestion that, with &#x22;an economy in trouble,&#x22; Sen. Barack Obama will raise taxes. Roberts did not note that, in fact, Obama has proposed tax cuts for low- and middle-income families and for those making less than $250,000 per year.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200809180024</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:43:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>With morning announcement of Palin pick comes morning sexism on cable news</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808290010</link>
<description>With reports that Sen. John McCain had picked Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin to be his running mate, sexist commentary on cable news followed. On CNN, John Roberts raised the question of whether as vice president, Palin would be able to devote the time necessary to care for her baby with Down syndrome, and on MSNBC, Andrea Mitchell and Chuck Todd suggested that Sen. Joe Biden bears the burden of having to adjust his behavior in a vice-presidential debate because of Palin&#x27;s sex.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808290010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:57:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Roberts did not challenge McCain adviser&#x27;s claim that McCain understands the economy by noting numerous dubious economic statements  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807030010</link>
<description>On CNN&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Situation Room&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Carly Fiorina asserted that Sen. John McCain is &#x22;extremely well qualified&#x22; on the economy and that he &#x22;understands how the economy works.&#x22; John Roberts did not challenge Fiorina&#x27;s assertion, and he concluded the interview without noting numerous statements by McCain on the economy that were false or disputed by economists -- including McCain&#x27;s own economic adviser -- or that McCain has repeatedly acknowledged weakness on economic issues.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807030010</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jul 2008 19:07:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Roberts asserted that McCain is a &#x22;maverick&#x22; and &#x22;independent&#x22; from Bush, ignoring McCain&#x27;s votes and statements  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807030003</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s John Roberts asserted that Sen. John McCain &#x22;is a very different person, at least his record in terms of being a maverick and independent, than George Bush.&#x22; But Roberts did not mention that, according to &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;Congressional Quarterly&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, McCain was the Bush administration&#x27;s most reliable supporter in the Senate in 2007, or that McCain said in 2005 that &#x22;on the transcendent issues, the most important issues of our day, I&#x27;ve been totally in agreement and support of President Bush.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807030003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:44:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media continue to falsely claim Clark criticized McCain&#x27;s service  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807010005</link>
<description>Several media reports falsely claimed that Wesley Clark criticized Sen. John McCain&#x27;s military service during a June 29 appearance on CBS&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Face the Nation&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, including CNN anchor John Roberts, who said that &#x22;Clark took a weekend hit at McCain, targeting his history as a war hero and his possible future as president.&#x22; In fact, Clark praised McCain as &#x22;a hero to me and to hundreds of thousands of millions of others in the Armed Forces as a prisoner of war.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807010005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:42:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Roberts  equated &#x22;Christian conservatives&#x22; with &#x22;values  voters&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711300001</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Anderson&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E; Cooper 360&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, CNN&#x27;s John Roberts said of Mike Huckabee: &#x22;[H]e 
brings Christian conservatives in the door, values voters.&#x22; CNN personalities 
have repeatedly linked &#x22;values&#x22; and religious faith to conservative voters or 
politicians.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711300001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:09:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kurtz: Clinton&#x27;s Ground Zero ad is treading on Giuliani&#x27;s &#x22;turf&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710070002</link>
<description>Discussing Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton&#x27;s new television advertisement, Howard Kurtz began
an article:
&#x22;In a stark, black-and-white ad that pictures her in a mask at Ground
Zero, Hillary Rodham Clinton is treading on Rudy Giuliani&#x27;s turf.&#x22;
Similarly, on CNN&#x27;s
&#x3C;em&#x3E;American Morning&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, John Roberts said that Clinton&#x27;s ad &#x22;really is a shot across Rudy Giuliani&#x27;s bow
to say,
&#x27;You&#x27;re not the only one who has a claim to 9-11 here.&#x27;
 But is she going too far? Is she politicizing 9-11?&#x22; Roberts did not ask whether Giuliani, who has repeatedly discussed 9-11 in campaign settings,
 is &#x22;going too far&#x22; or &#x22;politicizing 9-11.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710070002</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 7 Oct 2007 14:25:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash.  Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, CNN ignored  McConnell&#x27;s retraction on role of newly expanded FISA in German terror  arrests</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709130007</link>
<description>After reporting on National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell&#x27;s claim that 
the recently approved law expanding the government&#x27;s ability to eavesdrop on 
U.S. citizens contributed to 
arrests in Germany, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and CNN have not 
subsequently reported that McConnell has since acknowledged that the newly 
passed law did not factor into the German arrests.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709130007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:03:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN failed to  detail Chertoff&#x27;s Katrina &#x22;problem&#x22; while discussing possible attorney general  appointment</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708280002</link>
<description>While 
discussing possible replacements for Alberto Gonzales, several CNN anchors and reporters cited DHS Secretary Michael 
Chertoff&#x27;s handling of the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina as a &#x22;potential 
problem&#x22; but did not provide any details regarding Chertoff&#x27;s mismanagement of 
the disaster. Indeed, two congressional reports specifically identified numerous failures by Chertoff and DHS in overseeing the 
government&#x27;s response.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708280002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:50:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Citing Cheney  praise of Edelman letter, CNN left out Gates&#x27; refutation of attack on  Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708010009</link>
<description>In a report on the &#x22;dispute&#x22; between the Bush administration and Senator Hillary 
Rodham Clinton, CNN&#x27;s John Roberts stated that during an interview Vice 
President Cheney told Larry King that he &#x22;backed a Pentagon bureaucrat [Eric 
Edelman] who has accused Clinton of helping the 
enemy in Iraq.&#x22; But Roberts did not note that 
Edelman is a &#x22;former top aide&#x22; to Cheney, nor that, in contrast with Cheney, 
Defense Secretary Gates responded to Clinton that the Pentagon in no way 
&#x22;believe[s] that congressional oversight emboldens our 
enemies.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708010009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Aug 2007 17:03:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN alleged &#x22;creative math&#x22; in Obama&#x27;s fundraising before debunking the allegation</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707180004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707180004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:40:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Will &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post &#x3C;/em&#x3E;reconsider its Supreme Court endorsement criteria after Roberts, Alito?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706300001</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post &#x3C;/em&#x3E;editorial board endorsed the nominations of John Roberts and Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court, asserting of Roberts that he possesses &#x22;a modest conception
of the judicial function and a strong belief in the stability of
precedent.&#x22; Since then, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; has criticized several Supreme Court
decisions written by or joined by Roberts or Alito, claiming that they show a
lack of judicial restraint and fidelity to precedent. Yet the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; has given no indication that its
evaluation of either nominee was flawed, or that it intends to revisit its
criteria for evaluating Supreme Court nominees.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706300001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 20:54:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media reported Giuliani speech at Regent, but not Robertson&#x27;s controversial history</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706270012</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706270012</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:25:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>