<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Michelle Malkin</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/michelle_malkin</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Michelle Malkin</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Fox News&#x27; Powers asserted, &#x22;I would have just immediately denounced&#x22; Farrakhan -- but Obama did  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802280009</link>
<description>While discussing Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s answers to Tim Russert&#x27;s questions about Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan at the February 26 Democratic presidential debate, Fox News contributor Kirsten Powers said: &#x22;If I was him, I would have just immediately denounced him.&#x22; In fact, Obama did denounce Farrakhan&#x27;s comments during the debate.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802280009</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:19:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media figures claimed Clinton&#x27;s emotional moment in NH was &#x22;pretend[],&#x22; not &#x22;genuine&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801090005</link>
<description>Discussing a recent campaign event during which Sen. Hillary Clinton&#x27;s voice broke while answering a question from the audience, several media figures have baselessly claimed that Clinton&#x27;s actions were not &#x22;genuine&#x22; or were &#x22;pretend[],&#x22; including Glenn Beck, who said of the incident, &#x22;Hillary Clinton isn&#x27;t just running for president, but she&#x27;s also making a run for the best actress nomination.&#x22; Michelle Malkin wrote that &#x22;[a]nyone who believes Hillary spontaneously teared up and got emotional on the campaign trail has been in a coma the last three decades.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801090005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:23:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media revive  characterization of Clinton as &#x22;calculating&#x22; after emotional moment in  NH</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801080008</link>
<description>While discussing a  recent campaign event during which Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton&#x27;s  voice broke as she talked about why she is seeking the presidency, several media  figures described Clinton&#x27;s actions as  &#x22;calculated,&#x22; reviving a characterization frequently made by the media that  Clinton is  &#x22;calculating.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801080008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Jan 2008 17:38:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox  graphics falsely asserted Castro &#x22;wants&#x22;  Clinton-Obama as &#x22;dream  team&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708290012</link>
<description>During a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends&#x3C;/em&#x3E; 
segment discussing an August 28 column by Cuban dictator Fidel Castro, on-screen 
text falsely asserted, 
&#x22;CASTRO&#x27;S DREAM TEAM: WANTS CLINTON AND OBAMA IN &#x27;08,&#x22; referring to Democratic 
presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Also during the 
segment, an on-screen graphic 
depicted Castro, Clinton, and Obama enclosed in a red heart. In fact, at no 
point in his column did Castro endorse Clinton or Obama. Indeed, he attributed 
to Clinton and Obama a pro-democratic view that he called an &#x22;error,&#x22; and he 
said of Clinton and Obama, &#x22;They are not making politics: they are playing a 
game of cards on a Sunday afternoon.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708290012</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:54:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Malkin on  Clinton-Edelman exchange: &#x22;Wasn&#x27;t this a case of Hillary ... playing armchair  general?&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707230009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707230009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:40:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media echoed, uncritically repeated Snow&#x27;s equating of Libby commutation with Clinton pardons</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707090003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707090003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:09:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Michelle Malkin distorted poll of U.S. Muslims to claim they are &#x22;cause for big concern&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705230009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705230009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 19:39:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Echoing Malkin&#x27;s blog, Gibson and Napolitano lamented VA Tech ban on handguns</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704170001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704170001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:37:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Malkin to Fox News guest: &#x22;Oh, geez. Here we go with the &#x27;blame whitey&#x27; again&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704130010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704130010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:46:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News whitewashes evangelical hostility to Romney&#x27;s faith</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702280002</link>
<description>While other media outlets, in
their coverage of Mitt Romney&#x27;s presidential campaign, have addressed the
longtime evangelical hostility to Romney&#x27;s Mormon faith, Fox News has largely
avoided the subject and has responded to other media coverage of the issue by alleging media bias or, in the case of one guest, accusing liberals of anti-Mormon bigotry.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702280002</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:50:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x27;s&#x3C;/em&#x3E; crush on right-wing bloggers</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702270003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702270003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:08:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Malkin, writer of &#x22;mean-spirited rantings,&#x22; accused Edwards bloggers of &#x22;foul-mouthed nutroots diatribes&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702080001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702080001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Feb 2007 19:28:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly wouldn&#x27;t call Penn &#x22;anti-American&#x22; minutes after &#x3C;em&#x3E;Factor&#x3C;/em&#x3E; referred to Penn as &#x22;anti-American&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701310010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701310010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:24:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Michelle Malkin&#x27;s credibility, R.I.P.</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701090003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701090003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:25:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Warbloggers refuse to admit their errors in making fraud allegations against AP</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701050012</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701050012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:26:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>