<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Pat Buchanan</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/pat_buchanan</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Pat Buchanan</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Buchanan said Reid doesn&#x27;t want Burris seated &#x22;[b]ecause he&#x27;s an African-American&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200901060019</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Pat Buchanan said of Roland Burris&#x27; appointment to the Senate and the Senate leadership&#x27;s refusal to seat him: &#x22;[W]hy does [Senate Majority Leader Harry] Reid not want this guy? Why can&#x27;t he get elected? Because he&#x27;s an African-American.&#x22; However, neither Matthews nor Buchanan mentioned that Reid stated -- well before Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich appointed Burris -- that the Senate would consider rejecting anyone appointed by Blagojevich. Nor did they mention that Reid previously denied that his opposition to Burris was based on race.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200901060019</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:04:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media cite Japan&#x27;s &#x22;lost decade&#x22; to criticize Obama&#x27;s economic stimulus plan, but economists disagree</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812220005</link>
<description>Numerous media figures have cited Japanese fiscal policy during the &#x22;lost decade&#x22; of the 1990s to criticize President-elect Barack Obama&#x27;s plan to undertake a large-scale stimulus program. These media figures ignore evidence that, according to prominent economists, economic conditions were improving in Japan before the Japanese government temporarily abandoned stimulus spending in an attempt to reduce the deficit.  &#x3C;br /&#x3E;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812220005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:03:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Scarborough&#x27;s explanation for repeatedly saying Franken &#x22;can steal&#x22; votes: &#x22;I&#x27;m like a scientist. This is a theory that I&#x27;m trying out&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812190003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Joe Scarborough again claimed that Al Franken &#x22;can steal&#x22; enough votes in the Minnesota Senate race to emerge victorious, marking at least the sixth time Scarborough has invoked &#x22;steal[ing]&#x22; votes since the recount began. Scarborough later denied that he was &#x22;saying Al Franken&#x27;s stealing votes&#x22; but was instead &#x22;just saying how easy would it be for Al Franken to steal 150 [votes].&#x22; He added: &#x22;I&#x27;m like a scientist. This is a theory that I&#x27;m trying out there.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812190003</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:01:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; continues obsession over &#x22;steal[ing]&#x22; votes in Minnesota</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812160014</link>
<description>Previously having stated that Democrat Al Franken &#x22;only needs to steal 130 more votes to win&#x22; his race against Republican Sen. Norm Coleman for Minnesota&#x27;s U.S. Senate seat, MSNBC&#x27;s Joe Scarborough again raised the subject of &#x22;steal[ing]&#x22; votes on the December 16 edition of &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; -- at least the fifth time he has made such comments since the recount began on November 19. After co-host Mika Brzezinski reported that Franken is behind Coleman by 188 votes, Scarborough asked Pat Buchanan, &#x22;Buchanan, can you steal 188 out of 1,500? That&#x27;s easy, right?&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812160014</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:49:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Heads still in the &#x22;clouds&#x22;: Media continue to use term to baselessly link Obama to Blagojevich scandal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812150008</link>
<description>In the absence of any allegations of wrongdoing by President-elect Barack Obama or his staff in connection with the scandal involving Gov. Rod Blagojevich, media figures continue to warn that a &#x22;cloud&#x22; hangs over Obama or assert that the scandal threatens to cast a &#x22;cloud&#x22; over Obama&#x27;s presidency.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812150008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:41:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Buchanan overstates Democratic support for Alito and Roberts on Supreme Court confirmation votes</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810200014</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Pat Buchanan misrepresented Senate votes by Democrats on the confirmations of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justice Samuel Alito, saying, &#x22;Roberts probably got 25 Democrats, Alito probably got a dozen.&#x22; In fact, four Democrats voted to confirm Alito, while Roberts received 22 votes from Democrats.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810200014</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:55:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media have repeatedly asserted Palin faces &#x22;low&#x22; or &#x22;lowered&#x22; expectations in debate, despite praise of her debate skills</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810010015</link>
<description>Several media figures have asserted that Gov. Sarah Palin faces &#x22;low&#x22; or &#x22;lowered&#x22; expectations in the upcoming vice-presidential debate and that she therefore faces a lower bar for victory than Sen. Joe Biden. They have made these assertions despite criticism by at least one member of the media over the media&#x27;s setting of a lower bar for Palin and despite praise of her performance in the Alaska gubernatorial debate by others in the media and by McCain campaign surrogate Mitt Romney.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810010015</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:49:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Scarborough falsely asserted that Obama &#x22;wants&#x22; &#x22;higher taxes&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200809290007</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, host Joe Scarborough falsely asserted that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;wants&#x22; &#x22;higher taxes.&#x22; In fact, the Tax Policy Center concluded that, compared to Sen. John McCain, &#x22;Obama would give larger tax cuts to low- and moderate-income households and pay some of the cost by raising taxes on high-income taxpayers&#x22; -- those households earning more than $250,000 per year.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200809290007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:38:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s Buchanan didn&#x27;t hear any DNC speakers say &#x22;the word &#x27;Guant&#x26;aacute;namo&#x27; &#x22; -- but Kerry did, just as MSNBC cut to commercial</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808280006</link>
<description>During MSNBC&#x27;s coverage of the Democratic convention, Pat Buchanan asked, &#x22;Has anybody heard the word &#x27;Guant&#x26;aacute;namo&#x27; mentioned this entire convention?&#x22; In fact, in his speech, Sen. John Kerry said, &#x22;President [Barack] Obama and Vice President [Joe] Biden will shut down Guant&#x26;aacute;namo,&#x22; but MSNBC cut to commercial break a fraction of a second before Kerry said the word &#x22;Guant&#x26;aacute;namo.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808280006</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:15:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Does MSNBC approve of Pat Buchanan&#x27;s appearances on a &#x22;pro-White&#x22; radio show?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808190010</link>
<description>MSNBC political analyst Pat Buchanan appeared on the June 29, 2008, and September 14, 2006, editions of&#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E; The Political Cesspool Radio Show&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, a program whose &#x22;Statement of Principles&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;asserts that it&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x22;represent[s] a philosophy that is pro-White.&#x22; Buchanan&#x27;s June 29 interview was streamed &#x22;Live&#x22; on the self-described &#x22;White Nationalist&#x22; and &#x22;White Pride&#x22; website Stormfront.org.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808190010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:08:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Buchanan again falsely suggested Obama did not visit wounded troops while abroad</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808050006</link>
<description>In his column, Pat Buchanan falsely suggested that Sen. Barack Obama did not visit wounded troops during his recent trip abroad. Buchanan asserted: &#x22;While the first half of his foreign trip, to Afghanistan and Iraq, was official, the European tour was campaign related. Yet, it was on this leg that a visit to wounded U.S. soldiers had been scheduled. As campaigning in a military hospital is prohibited, the visit was canceled.&#x22; In fact, according to Buchanan&#x27;s colleague, NBC News chief foreign affairs correspondent Andrea Mitchell, Obama did visit with wounded troops during the &#x22;official&#x22; part of his tour.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808050006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Aug 2008 16:28:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Buchanan still asking of Obama: &#x22;Who does this guy think he is?&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808040002</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Pat Buchanan praised an attack ad by the McCain campaign that refers to Sen. Barack Obama as &#x22;The One&#x22; and said the ad &#x22;goes right to an enormous vulnerability that Barack has created for himself with his grandiosity.&#x22; Echoing a comment he made last week, Buchanan said: &#x22;The question&#x27;s now becoming, &#x27;Who does this guy think he is?&#x27; ... I think that is the real question.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808040002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Aug 2008 13:58:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s Buchanan adopts &#x22;hubris&#x22; theme from Milbank&#x27;s falsehood-laden column, says of Obama: &#x22;[W]ho ... the heck does this guy think he is&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807310008</link>
<description>Pat Buchanan criticized the McCain campaign attack ad that refers to Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s &#x22;celebrity,&#x22; but said &#x22;there is a truth behind all this.&#x22; Touting Dana Milbank&#x27;s falsehood-laden &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column as &#x22;credible,&#x22; Buchanan said, &#x22;[W]ho is he and who ... the heck does this guy think he is, is becoming a real issue for Barack Obama.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807310008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:17:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s Buchanan falsely suggested Obama did not visit wounded troops, repeated smears of Obama&#x27;s patriotism  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807280005</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Pat Buchanan asserted that an ad by Sen. John McCain attacking Sen. Barack Obama for not visiting the U.S. military&#x27;s Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany played into &#x22;the sense that, you know, Barack is not one of us. He&#x27;s just not a normal guy who would go see the wounded troops.&#x22; In fact, Andrea Mitchell reported that, while in Iraq, Obama &#x22;visited a casualty unit in the Green Zone, without photographers, as part of the congressional delegation.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807280005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:02:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media figures continue to cite &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; ranking of Obama as &#x22;most liberal&#x22; senator in &#x27;07 without noting subjectivity  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806270010</link>
<description>NPR&#x27;s Ren&#x26;eacute;e Montagne, MSNBC&#x27;s Pat Buchanan, and CNN&#x27;s Bill Bennett all referred to the &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s 2007 Vote Ratings, which ranked Sen. Barack Obama the most liberal senator that year, without noting the subjectivity of the ratings. The &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; based its rankings not on all votes cast by senators in 2007, but on &#x22;99 key Senate votes, selected by &#x3C;em&#x3E;NJ&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reporters and editors, to place every senator on a liberal-to-conservative scale.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806270010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:21:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>