<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Polling</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/polling</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Polling</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E; asserted as fact that America &#x22;remains right of center,&#x22; but a former &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editor disagrees</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200811170018</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Evan Thomas and Richard Wolffe repeated the assertion previously made by &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E; colleague Jon Meacham that the country &#x22;remains right of center.&#x22; Thomas and Wolffe cited as evidence exit polling that showed more respondents identifying themselves as &#x22;conservative&#x22; than as &#x22;liberal.&#x22;  But political scientists dispute the reliability of voters&#x27; identification with political ideologies, and the former editor of &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Times&#x27;&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial page asserted &#x22;the only problem&#x22; with conservatives claiming America is a &#x22;center-right&#x22; country is that &#x22;[i]t isn&#x27;t true. Or at least, not anymore.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200811170018</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:10:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media conservatives claim America is &#x22;center-right,&#x22; but political scientists challenge reliance on voter self-identification</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200811100013</link>
<description>Several conservative commentators claim America is ideologically a &#x22;center-right&#x22; country, citing as evidence general election exit polls showing that 22 percent of respondents identify themselves as &#x22;liberal,&#x22; 44 percent as &#x22;moderate&#x22; and 34 percent as &#x22;conservative.&#x22; But political scientists dispute the reliability of voters&#x27; identification with political ideologies, and other polling has found that a strong majority favored the more progressive position on a number of issues.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200811100013</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:01:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Selectively citing Gallup poll&#x27;s findings, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; joined Drudge Report in touting &#x22;Gallup shock&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810170015</link>
<description>MSNBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe &#x3C;/em&#x3E;echoed the Drudge Report by displaying the on-screen text &#x22;Gallup shock&#x22; and selectively citing only one of three findings from an October 13-15 Gallup daily tracking poll of the presidential race -- the one that showed Sen. Barack Obama holding his smallest lead over Sen. John McCain.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810170015</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:48:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; inflated Bush&#x27;s approval ratings, falsely portrayed unemployment rate under Bush</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808070011</link>
<description>In an editorial, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; asserted that President Bush &#x22;had very high poll ratings (80 percent to 90 percent) throughout his first term&#x22; and went on to say that during his tenure, he &#x22;reduced unemployment to still record-levels.&#x22; In fact, Bush&#x27;s approval ratings peaked between 80 percent and 95 percent in September 2001 before trending downward through the end of his first term, which he finished at around 50 percent. Additionally, the unemployment rate under Bush after the 2001 recession bottomed out at 4.4 percent in March 2007 -- a higher level than when Bush took office in January 2001, when the rate was 4.2 percent.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808070011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:39:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Hurt falsely claimed &#x22;most people believe the federal government is the &#x3C;em&#x3E;only&#x3C;/em&#x3E; thing that could actually make health care worse&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804150010</link>
<description>The &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Charles Hurt wrote that when Sen. Hillary Clinton proposed national health-care reform as first lady, &#x22;Americans revolted over her proposals,&#x22; adding that &#x22;she still doesn&#x27;t understand that most people believe the federal government is the &#x3C;em&#x3E;only &#x3C;/em&#x3E;thing that could actually make health care worse.&#x22; In fact, recent polling suggests that a majority of Americans support health-care reform proposals that expand the government&#x27;s role.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804150010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:17:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash.  Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;  claimed &#x22;congressional approval ratings ... a notch below Bush&#x27;s,&#x22; but &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; poll says Dems above  Bush</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712130008</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported that 
&#x22;Democrats are trying to prove that they can be an equal partner to [President] 
Bush&#x22; and that &#x22;congressional approval ratings dropp[ed] this week to 32 
percent, a notch below Bush&#x27;s 33 percent, according to the latest &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;-ABC News poll.&#x22; But 
according to the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s own 
polling, congressional approval is not dropping, and the approval rating for 
&#x22;Democrats in Congress&#x22; is seven percentage points higher than Bush&#x27;s in the 
latest poll.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712130008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:45:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Matthews cited Zogby Interactive poll without noting criticism of methodology</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711280004</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, citing &#x22;a new Zogby poll,&#x22; Chris Matthews stated:
&#x22;Tonight, our Big
Number is the number
five. That&#x27;s the number of Republican presidential candidates that
[Sen.] Hillary Clinton trails in the November matchups.&#x22; However, Matthews did not note that
the poll was an online Zogby Interactive poll in which participants were chosen from a database of volunteers.
Matthews omitted this fact despite statements by the American Association for
Public Opinion
Research and Democratic pollster Mark
Blumenthal -- who
appeared earlier in the day on MSNBC --
that such polls are unreliable.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711280004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:44:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Matthews  again claimed &#x22;Republicans are known as the party of national security and of  moral values&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710100011</link>
<description>Moderator Chris Matthews asserted during the October 9 Republican presidential 
debate, &#x22;Polls show that Republicans are known as the party of national security 
and of moral values.&#x22; But recent polling shows Democrats either tied or at a 
slight advantage against Republicans on the issue of national security, as well 
as holding an advantage in sharing voters&#x27; moral values.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710100011</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:47:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s  Murray cited flawed poll, repeated GOP claim that &#x22;the public has grown more patient on Iraq&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709230002</link>
<description>In a
&#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;
article, Shailagh Murray wrote: &#x22;GOP Senate offices circulated the
results of a Gallup poll released this week that showed 54 percent of
those surveyed think [Gen. David] Petraeus&#x27;s plan for removing troops
is the right pace, or even too quick.&#x22; However, this poll question did not explain to respondents how many troops Petraeus&#x27; plan called for removing or over what period
 of time this withdrawal would take place. Other polling shows that when respondents are told specifically what Petraeus recommended, the results are dramatically different.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709230002</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 17:13:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AP, CNN, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported GOP claim that Webb  proposal is unconstitutional without noting Webb  response</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709210004</link>
<description>Reporting on Sen. Jim Webb&#x27;s proposal to &#x22;specify minimum periods between 
deployment of units and members of the Armed Forces&#x22; deployed in 
Iraq and Afghanistan, several media outlets 
noted Sen. John McCain&#x27;s criticism that the amendment is &#x22;unconstitutional&#x22; 
without including comments from Webb or any other Democrat defending the 
constitutionality of the proposal.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709210004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:04:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring polling,  &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Note&#x3C;/em&#x3E; blamed Reid for ensuring  &#x22;the return of polarized Iraq  politics&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709190011</link>
<description>ABC News&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Note&#x3C;/em&#x3E; claimed that 
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, in favoring legislation calling for troop 
withdrawal timelines, &#x22;virtually ensured the return of polarized 
Iraq politics -- and is giving the 
left the showdown (take two) it craves.&#x22; But polling repeatedly shows that a 
significant majority of the country supports withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq in 
-- at most -- a timeframe that comports with what Reid has 
suggested.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709190011</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:17:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Hill&#x3C;/em&#x3E; cited flawed Rasmussen poll to assert &#x22;solid support for Petraeus plan&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709140006</link>
<description>An article in &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Hill&#x3C;/em&#x3E; on a recommendation before Congress by Gen. David Petraeus to
reduce the number of U.S. troops in Iraq to pre-&#x22;surge&#x22; levels by the summer of 2008
asserted that, in President Bush&#x27;s address to the nation laying out the plan,
&#x22;his sell might not be so difficult,&#x22; citing as evidence a
Rasmussen Reports poll that &#x22;showed that 43 percent of Americans support
the Petraeus plan while 38 percent oppose it.&#x22; But the poll did not offer respondents other options to choose from -- including withdrawal
of a greater number of troops than that recommended by Petraeus.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709140006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:13:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Reuters article  uncritically quoted &#x22;expert&#x22; who said Dems face &#x22;nightmare scenario&#x22; on  Iraq</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708220015</link>
<description>A Reuters article 
uncritically quoted Matthew Woessner, a professor at Pennsylvania State 
University-Harrisburg, saying 
that Democrats face a potential &#x22;nightmare scenario&#x22; over Iraq if &#x22;the sum total 
of the pressures from their constituency groups, are out of step with mainstream 
America.&#x22; The article 
didn&#x27;t cite any polls to back up Woessner&#x27;s claim; in fact, polls show that a majority of 
Americans oppose the war in Iraq and believe that some or all troops should 
be withdrawn from Iraq.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708220015</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:54:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; soft bigotry of low expectations -- cites Bush&#x27;s &#x22;high&#x22; 45% approval on dealing with terrorism</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708220007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708220007</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:09:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Olbermann named O&#x27;Reilly &#x22;Worst Person&#x22; for misrepresenting poll on gay rights group endorsements</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708170010</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Countdown&#x3C;/em&#x3E;,
Keith Olbermann named Bill O&#x27;Reilly the &#x22;winner&#x22; in his nightly &#x22;Worst Person in the
World&#x22; segment for falsely asserting, as &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; documented,
that a poll by &#x22;Pew
Research or something like that&#x22; &#x22;says that most Americans won&#x27;t vote
for you if you get an endorsement by a gay rights group.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708170010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:26:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>